<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Laws of Ochlocracy &#187; estoppel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ochlocracy.org/law/definition/estoppel/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ochlocracy.org/law</link>
	<description>Trivial Tales from the Fringes of Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 20:38:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>on equitable estoppel (estoppel in pais)</title>
		<link>http://ochlocracy.org/law/on-equitable-estoppel-estoppel-in-pais/27</link>
		<comments>http://ochlocracy.org/law/on-equitable-estoppel-estoppel-in-pais/27#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mr Law</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[estoppel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feinberg v pfeiffer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ricketts v scothorn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ochlocracy.org/law/?p=27</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Where does promissory estoppel end and equitable estoppel begin?
first of all what the hell is estoppel?
The term comes from estoupail, which meant &#8220;stopper plug&#8221; in French. Its is stopping something&#8211; like an imbalance.  Or the imbalance of the situation. The term is related to the verb &#8220;estop&#8221; which comes from the Old French term estopper, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ochlocracy.org/law/on-equitable-estoppel-estoppel-in-pais/27/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>on Promissory Estoppel</title>
		<link>http://ochlocracy.org/law/on-promissory-estoppel/21</link>
		<comments>http://ochlocracy.org/law/on-promissory-estoppel/21#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mr Law</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cardozo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charitable giving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dissent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eisbein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[estoppel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johnston and Johnson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ochlocracy.org/law/?p=21</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Typically discussed in the context of the law of charitable subscriptions (that is charitable giving, and gifts), the case of Allegheny College v National Chautauqua County Bank of Jamestown is a good test case for the doctrine of promissary estoppel. Why? The reason mainly is that there is a clearly articulated assent and dissent and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ochlocracy.org/law/on-promissory-estoppel/21/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
